Given the disturbing events in Tucson, it is not surprising that the President and others are calling for a more civil political dialogue. I agree with their call, but before we get too far down the road, we should make sure that we are talking about the same “civility.”

I believe much of the civility backlash stems from a lack of understanding of what true civility really is. Civility is not feigned attempts at niceness. Civility does not require that we compromise our position. And true civility does not even ask that we like each other. What genuine civility does require is that we listen; that we remain respectful; and that we act upon the ideal that gave birth to this nation – all men are created equal. This requires the maturity to extend civility though it may not be returned.

However as a conservative, I bothers me to see that too many on the right are choosing the path of least resistance here, namely to scream louder, point fingers at those “hypocrites, and throw broad-brush insults. This may get them noticed in the short run, but over the long haul this type of behavior undermines and marginalizes the very cause for which they seem to be fighting for.

The author of the post “On Civility” is correct in that today we face a monumental task. Our debt is unsustainable; our economy is shaky at best; and our ideological divide has never been greater. But calls to “shove civility up their ass” will do little to improve the situation. Instead we should look to examples of the past where impossible odds were overcome.

There is a reason Washington’s presence at the Convention was critical to its success. Others, like Sam and John Adams, Patrick Henry, and even Thomas Jefferson simply did not have the reputation of civility, which engendered the trust of all sides and could give a constitutional convention the weight it needed for the monumental task at hand. The life and work of Martin Luther King, Jr. is another testament to the power of civility. These men were passionate. They did not compromise. But they understood the power of civility and cultivated it.

The question for us remains: do we have the courage to follow in the footsteps of a Washington or a Dr. King? For the sake of future generations, I hope we do.

I am grateful that Ron Paul has stepped up to address the issue of overbearing airport security. As he well says in his remarks, “…enough is enough.”

To me the direction our airport security has taken is symbolic of a greater problem we face in America. It was a problem forseen by our founding fathers, particularly Alexander Hamilton.

From Federalist Paper No. 8:

“Safety from external danger is the most powerful director of national conduct. Even the ardent love of liberty will after a time give way to its dictates…and [the] alarm attendant on a state of continual danger will compel nations the most attached to liberty to resort for repose and security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political  rights. To be more safe, they at length become willing to run the risk of being less free.“

Prophetic words. I am grateful to see we still have those back in DC who value freedom.

I had a chance today to attend a workshop with Karl Rove, who was in town promoting his new book: Courage & Consequence.

It was an interesting hour. I was a little disappointed that much of the time was spent on storytelling and not on sharing his thoughts on campaign strategy (which was how the session was branded).

A couple key takeaways for me: 1) the power of influencers in a campaign and 2) data matters.

On a side note, when asked about the senate race, he endorsed Bennett as a “real” conservative. Perhaps that much time in the beltway has altered his view of what a real conservative is. I also wonder if he knows that Bennett’s first real campaign promise was to term-limit himself and if Bennett is willing to break that promise what would hold him back from breaking all his others.

Today on our radio show, The Conservative Professor, I threw out my top 5 books for conservatives if I were going to create a Conservative 101.

1. The Law: Fredric Bastiat
2. American Cause: Russell Kirk
3. Conservative Mind: Russell Kirk
4. Commentaries on the Constitution: Joseph Story
5. Road to Serfdom: F.A. Hayek

What would you add/subtract from this list and why?